The tutorial is of most interest to lawyers, software developers and managers who run or advise software businesses that modify andor redistribute software under the terms of the gnu gpl or who wish to do so in the future, and those who wish to make use of existing gpld software in their enterprise. See the license for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the license. Linus torvalds rejects the planned update to the seminal opensource license, citing its drm provisions. An uninstaller allows you to remove vertrigo from hard disc. My question is, what license would cover the second part. It consists of the gpl, plus an exception allowing linking to software not under the gpl. The licenses are incompatible in one direction only, and it is a result of asfs licensing. The most widespread use of gpl is in reference to the gnu gpl, which is commonly abbreviated simply as gpl when it is understood that the term refers. An update to the fsfs list of free software licenses lists the new apache license, version 2. It seems to me that the chief difference between the mit license and gpl is that the mit doesnt require modifications be open sourced whereas the.
Difference between freeware and open source software different types of open source licenses. The writers of the license maintain it is free software, but the free software foundation says it is not free because it infringes the socalled zero freedom of the gpl, that is, the freedom to use the software for any purpose. Why corporations favors the apache license over the gpllgpl. My current situation is that i am developing an application that is made from a gpl v3 licensed programming language. The gnulgpl is very popular among independent developers and companies which mainly deals with open source software. To apply the apache license to your work, attach the following boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets replaced with your own identifying information. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a programto make sure it remains free software for all its users. The apache software foundation page on gpl compatibility says that neither gplv2 nor gplv3 can be incorporated into an apache 2 project it doesnt directly make a statement about gplv1. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses wikipedia. Nonsoftware enterprises like banks or states and folk. Apache is decent model when you have expertise and money, but do not have significant market share yet.
Yet, many foss licenses, like the apache license, and all free software licenses allow commercial use of foss components. Most gpl version 2 software is actually licensed as gpl version 2 or any later version, or. Tldrlegal software licenses explained in plain english. The mit license is gplcompatible, but unlike the traditionally. Open source license compatibility gplv3 and apache 2. As a reminder, open source software licenses generally.
What are the major consequences of using apache software over mit. Who could say the terrible things that would happen if we. The gnu affero general public license is based on the gnu gpl, but has an additional term to allow users who interact with the licensed software over a network to receive the source for that program. They require all modifications, and any software based on the open.
This would be incompatible with asfs requirement that all apache software must be distributed under the apache license 2. We have got to know from legal department that we cant use lgpl 2. However, gplv3 software cannot be included in apache projects. Heres the second post in our open source software license faq series. If you have some code you are thinking of releasing under an open source license, and you want a quick overview of the broadstrokes differences between these licenses, you have come to the right place. Licenses for your open source project mit vs gpl vs apache. Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions preserving the provenance and openness of the software. Copyleft licenses like gpl are, generally speaking, bad for business. Its great that you write and distribute free software, but if you insist on using a noncopylefted free software license the apache 2.
The software freedom law center provides practical advice for developers about including permissively licensed source. It is essentially identical to the x11 license, with an optional alternative way of providing license notices. If you are releasing software under a gpl license, it is also necessary to. Its a popular and widely deployed license backed by a. The differences between the gpl, lgpl and the bsd fosswire.
So software that uses any gpllicensed component has to release its full source code and all rights to modify and distribute the entire code. You should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program. Gpl license for software and online service comparison. The gpl is by far the best software license for endusers of the code. There are varying shades of emphasis and no two licences are completely alike, so the apache license v2. The general public license has long been the preferred license for opensource businesses, but new analysis suggests that apachestyle licensing. The fsf recommends at least compatible with gpl and preferably copyleft.
Short for general public license, the license that accompanies some open source software that details how the software and its accompany source code can be freely copied, distributed and modified. The gpls mention this explicitly, and implement it using concepts like distribute and convey. Apache 2 software can therefore be included in gplv3 projects, because the gplv3 license accepts our software. In our previous blog post you could read about open source software and why it is important to add a software license to your software. This research reveals a license divide between open source developers and enterprises. Gpl version 3 is designed to be compatible with two important licenses. The fall of gpl and the rise of permissive opensource licenses.
Difference between different types of open sources licenses. Unlike the apache license, the gpl embeds the decision as to the codes open source nature into the code itself. The apache software license is incompatible with the gpl because it has a specific requirement that is not in the gpl. The apache license is a permissive free software license written by the apache software foundation asf. Software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula youtube. The apache license, on the other hand, is favored by the big corporations for their open source projects. Based on this page, i can see that only apache license 2. This license has been superseded by the apache license, version 2. Gnu lesser gpl and apache software licenses denver.
The apache software foundation and the free software foundation agree that the apache license 2. Asf is the apache software foundation and not a license. Source, the most popular permissive licenses are mit and apache 2. I am writing software licensed under mit and including gpl software. Visit to learn how were building healthy and resilient communities. The patent provisions of the common public license cpl and eclipse public license epl are described by mark webbink as quite similar to that of the apache license, version 2. Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail.
Most surveys indicate that the vast majority of open source projects use the mit license, the apache license, and the gpl or their variants. It allows users to use the software for any purpose, to distribute it, to modify it, and to distribute modified versions of the software under the terms of the license, without concern for royalties. The following licenses are sorted by the number of conditions, from most gnu agplv3 to none unlicense. Top 10 apache license questions answered whitesource. This license has the same disadvantages as the lgpl. Vertrigoserv is a complete free wamp server allowing php development for windows. Mit license spot the differences due to the helpful visualizations at a glance category. The free software foundation considers the apache license, version 2. In this blog we will start off by looking at two of the open source licenses we use at the hyve, apache 2. Patent clauses in software licences software patents. At the 5th gplv3 conference, richard stallman was recorded saying. Software licenses in plain english lookup popular software licenses summarized ataglance. Tldrlegal provides generally good summaries of licenses.
The asf and its projects release their software products under the apache license. Which open source software licenses to use and why. So, for instance, the mit license grants users the right to deal in the software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, andor sell copies of the software. Various licenses and comments about them gnu project. Previous versions of the sgi free software license b were not free software licenses, despite their name. We recommend that people consider using the gnu agpl for any software which will commonly be run over a network. Apache 2 software can therefore be included in gplv3 projects, because the gplv3 license accepts our software into gplv3 works. The free source crowd looked to the gnu general public license as the ideal license to enforce user freedom, because it forced ironclad guarantees that the code in question would remain open source, while the open source group focused on a broader definition of freedom, preferring the more liberal apache license.
All software produced by the apache software foundation or any of its projects or subjects is licensed according to the terms of the documents listed below. Linus torvalds says gpl v3 violates everything that gplv2 stood for duration. See the gnu general public license for more details. Sluc is a software license published in spain in december 2006 to allow all but military use.
I detailed analysis of the gnu gpl and related licenses. The lgpl is similar to the gpl, but is more designed for software libraries where you want to allow nongpl applications to link to your library and utilise it. In this video i explain the difference between mit, gpl, apache licenses and how to write custom licenses. Its also arguable whether the licenses mentioned other than apache have an implicit patent grant. The wordiness creates greater specificity about contributors obligations, which might help in a dispute. I can include mitlicensed code in a gpllicensed product, but can i include gpllicensed code in a mitlicensed product. Weve compiled a list of your top 10 questions about the gpl license in the last post.
Summary the licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. The apache license has a similar philosophy to the mit, but uses more words. Despite our best efforts, the fsf has never considered the apache license to be compatible with gpl version 2, citing the patent termination and. If you modify the software, you still have to give back the source code, but you are allowed to link it with proprietary stuff without giving the source code to all of that back. The gpl is still the worlds most popular opensource license but its declining in use. The fall of gpl and the rise of permissive opensource. I think that gpl would be the most appropriate license for the first part. In this article, we take a look at the difference between this two licenses to find out why. The apache software foundation asf, clearly say that forking some apache licensed code into your gpl project is illegal because then the apache software would have to be distributed under gplv3. Compatible, ie that gpl3 software can link too apl software, is new gpl2 code wasnt able to link toinclude apache licensed code, is new but that is not at all the same as being equal, the apl is a bsd like license whic. Among the permissive class of free software licences, apache 2. Gnu general public license, version 3 spdx short identifier.
1305 1225 750 1184 99 28 111 1489 176 578 38 609 123 1505 1305 84 1147 213 887 852 1435 552 912 190 887 1089 443 1396 1329 438